Reflexivity and participation in communities CZ
7. Appendix 2 Evaluation Feedback from Dublin IP INTENSIVE PROGRAMME IN DUBLIN (Activities C1 and C3 within the Project), 26th October – 30th October 2021
7.3. What suggestions do you have for the follow up Intensive programme in Gent?
CZ1 Health aspects of care in social services. CZ2 Can we do less, slowly and more thoroughly? CZ3 If the situation allowed more ?? inputs to the organisations practice in organisation and living??? Health and social organisation CZ4 More time for discussions, more practical examples from participation in a healthcare setting if possible CZ5 As I wrote above, I think that greater student centered approach and awareness would be welcomed by all students. I also think that although the program was very, very interesting, it was quite extensive. I could imagine that, for example, the afternoon program would follow the morning program in the form of small discussion groups, I would welcome the use of the techniques of the world café, etc. To involve as many people in discussions and group work and overcome the fear of performing in front of a large group. I believe that international cooperation would bring a lot of new knowledge arising directly at the meeting place. BG1 More space for debate on the work of the learners BG2 Focus more on the importance of the national context (historical, policy…) to gain a better understanding of national evolutions, initiatives… in relation to participation. BG3 To continue our discussion to give more depth to the insights coming up in Dublin. BG4 More space for the presentations of the students + to debate them afterwards. CZ6 I think the reflection time we were given was very useful, particularly the group reflection on Saturday has generated a lot of helpful insights. It would be great to have this time in Gent as well. CZ7 I have really enjoyed the Dublin meeting. Maybe, I would recommend being a bit more punctual about the schedule. I would appreciate fostering discussions to become more deep and fruitful. PT1 Somewhat fewer formal presentations, more space for discussion and particularly the more intensive involvement of students as the “test objects” of the methods for teaching participation which we are aiming for PT2&3 It was quite interesting to have contact with the social workers of the institutions from different areas to do a "mini internship "of participant observation, in a group reflect to be discussed in a "Debate" session." IE1 It would be helpful to have more presentations on projects involving service users. FI 1 I think that it would be interesting to compare more different countries and how participation actualises in every day social work in different contexts. FI3 The program could be more structured, i.e., timetable and what is expected of the participants in each lesson. |